Purely AI-generated songs declared ineligible for Grammy Awards


Getty Pictures

Amid increasing use of generative AI in music, the Recording Academy has up to date its guidelines for the 66th annual Grammy Awards relating to the position of AI in thought of works, Reuters reports. To be eligible for an award, a track will need to have significant human authorship. Purely algorithmically generated music can’t win a Grammy.

Based on the 66th Grammy Awards Guidelines & Tips booklet, works generated solely by AI aren’t eligible for the awards. Nonetheless, the Academy doesn’t fully exclude AI’s potential position within the creation course of. Works that incorporate parts of “AI-generated materials” are eligible in the event that they meet two key standards, and we’ll quote the booklet itself:

  • “The human-authored elements of the work should be significant and greater than ‘de minimis.'” (The booklet defines “de minimis” as “missing significance or significance, or so minor as to benefit disregard.”)
  • “These human-authored elements should be related to the class wherein the work is entered. As an example, if the work is submitted in a songwriting class, there must be important human authorship concerned within the music and/or lyrics. Equally, for a efficiency class, the human efficiency component must be important.”

The principles additionally state that if a bit of labor incorporates materials generated by AI, the people or groups who programmed or operated the AI to generate that materials can’t be thought of for a Grammy award based mostly on that contribution. In different phrases, if a track makes use of AI to generate a melody, lyrics, or another component, the individuals who created or utilized the AI don’t get credit score for Grammy consideration for that particular AI-generated half. The credit score and potential for nomination or award receipt go to the human parts that considerably contribute to the track.

AI in music can take completely different kinds. Over the previous 12 months, we have seen growing progress in AI fashions that may create full audio compositions from scratch based mostly on textual content descriptions, reminiscent of Riffusion, MusicLM from Google, and the extra lately introduced MusicGen from Meta. Underneath these guidelines, songs created utilizing these instruments (or others like them) alone wouldn’t be eligible for receiving a Grammy award—assuming they had been adequate.

Then again, we’ve also reported about The Beatles utilizing AI to remaster songs and doubtlessly pull out vocals from a demo tape to be used in a “last” Beatles monitor. In these instances, because the AI could be restricted to processing the audio moderately than producing a composition or efficiency from scratch, we might guess the ensuing songs or albums would nonetheless be eligible for Grammy consideration in most classes.

Someplace in between lies the usage of generative AI instruments reminiscent of vocal generators in songs. In these instances, the AI “vocalist” couldn’t win an award in a class that awards vocal performances, but when the track nonetheless contained substantial human artistic parts, the track might doubtlessly win in a special class that considers human contributions to the track, even with an AI vocal monitor.

Right here is the complete listing of the brand new AI guidelines, listed in a brand new part referred to as “Generative AI”:

The GRAMMY Award acknowledges artistic excellence. Solely human creators are eligible to be submitted for consideration for, nominated for, or win a GRAMMY Award. A piece that accommodates no human authorship just isn’t eligible in any Classes. A piece that options parts of A.I. materials (i.e., materials generated by means of synthetic intelligence know-how) is eligible in relevant Classes; nonetheless: (1) the human authorship element of the work submitted should be significant and greater than de minimis; (2) such human authorship element should be related to the Class wherein such work is entered (e.g., if the work is submitted in a songwriting Class, there should be significant and greater than de minimis human authorship in respect of the music and/or lyrics; if the work is submitted in a efficiency Class, there should be significant and greater than de minimis human authorship in respect of the efficiency); and (3) the creator(s) of any A.I. materials included into the work aren’t eligible to be nominees or GRAMMY recipients insofar as their contribution to the portion of the work that consists of such A.I materials is worried. De minimis is outlined as missing significance or significance; so minor as to benefit disregard.

As AI continues to emerge as a artistic however controversial instrument within the arts, the Grammy rule introduction serves as a notable assertion concerning the significance of human creativity within the music trade. Though generative AI could sometime have the capability to create spectacular compositions, the Grammy stage stays largely reserved for human artists—in the interim.

And whereas synthetic intelligence-powered rock stars needn’t apply, an “Al” as in “Alfred” star made a joke concerning the new guidelines on Twitter.

A tweet from Weird Al Yankovic about the new AI Grammy rules.
Enlarge / A tweet from Bizarre Al Yankovic concerning the new AI Grammy guidelines.


The 66th annual Grammy Awards will happen in 2024.

Source link